Sample case study. Redwood Bend is a fictional Nation on ECO's demo network. Every figure comes from its records for one calendar year, January to December, which were created for demonstration. It shows what a year of running an office on ECO could look like. The "before" picture and the time saved are assumptions based on conversations with tribal offices across the nation, not a detailed survey.
The office at a glance
A small cultural and heritage office handled 78 consultations, added 212 items to its Collection, managed 6 grants worth $686,000 and ran a program of 20 volunteers in one year. It did this with nine office staff, several of them part time: a cultural resources officer, a museum director, a language administrator, a grants coordinator, a records secretary, an office manager, a school administrator, an IT support person and a hardware deployment manager.
| Work | This year |
|---|---|
| Consultation letters received | 78 |
| Matters (research requests, loans and other) | 30, plus 76 letters, calls and meetings (68 tied to a matter) |
| Outside contacts | 12 organizations, 27 people |
| Field monitoring | 44 logs, 4 invoices, 24 site visits |
| Council | 14 meetings held (1 more scheduled), 18 resolutions |
| Collection | 238 items (212 added in the year), 9 loans, 8 items and copies returned from outside institutions |
| Grants | 6 awards, $686,000 |
| Volunteers | 20 enrolled (7 students); 19 logged approved hours, including 6 students; 1,231.5 hours in all |
| Programs | 42 sessions, 589 attendees (154 youth) |
| Projects | 7, with 1,111.5 staff hours tracked |
Before ECO: assumed baseline
Tribal offices do strong work with small staffs and limited tools. In this example, the office ran on inboxes, paper, spreadsheets and memory. The table shows the assumed starting point, based on conversations with tribal offices across the nation, not a detailed survey.
| Area | Before ECO |
|---|---|
| Consultation letters | Arrived by mail and to several inboxes. Due dates kept on a wall calendar or in one person's head. About half answered after the due date. Average 31 days to answer. |
| Matters and correspondence | Each staff member kept their own email and notes. No single record of what was promised to whom. |
| Contacts | Agency contacts in personal address books; lost when staff changed. |
| Field monitoring | Paper logs, mileage on separate sheets, invoices built by hand weeks later. |
| Council records | Minutes in Word files; follow-up actions tracked by memory. |
| Collection | Spreadsheet of items with no storage locations. Last full inventory several years old. Loans and items held elsewhere tracked in email. |
| Grants | Award terms in PDFs. Match tracked in a spreadsheet updated before each report. Volunteer hours on sign-in sheets, often never counted as match. |
| Volunteers and students | Sign-in sheets. No record of orientation, guardian consent or background checks in one place. |
| Projects | Plans in documents; no view of planned against actual time or money. |
| Programs | Paper attendance; youth counts rebuilt for each report. |
| Training | What a new person needed to know lived with the person who held the job before. |
| Software | Specialist tools cost too much, so most work was done by hand, and the few tools in use did not connect. Members had no private place; community sharing happened on public social media, under the platform's terms, not the Nation's protocols. |
What the office put in place
The office moved its daily work into one private system the Nation controls, part by part, over the first two months.
- Letters and requests: consultations, matters, research requests and contacts in one place, each with its due date, and a help desk for members' questions to the office.
- Today and Deadlines: one morning list of everything due across the office.
- Places and field work: the Atlas with a background map, routes and areas, and map files in and out; monitoring logs with costs; invoices made from the logs; and finds reported to the office straight from the field.
- Collection and museum: catalog, storage locations, inventory rounds, loans, conservation, and items and copies returned from outside institutions.
- Projects and people: projects with plans and a Gantt chart, the volunteer program, training and standards, and the Work board with applications and TERO hiring records.
- Funding and reports: grant awards, match, programs and attendance, staff time and miles.
- Governance: council records and the Nation's own protocols on the records they govern.
- Language and learning: classes with lessons in audio, video and documents, assignments, quizzes and a gradebook.
- Across the office: email reminders, e-signatures, spreadsheet import and export, and a public page that shows only what the Nation chooses.
Results over the year
Late consultation answers fell from more than half to almost none, and the office counted $36,248 of volunteer time toward grant match that would otherwise have gone unclaimed. The chart below the table shows consultation answers month by month.
| Measure | Start of year | End of year |
|---|---|---|
| Consultation letters answered late | 6 of 11 (Jan–Feb) | 1 of 18 answered letters (Sep–Nov); 5 open letters past due and flagged |
| Average days to answer a consultation | 31 | 24 |
| Collection items missing at inventory | 8 missing and 4 misplaced of 62 checked (April round) | 4 missing and 1 misplaced of 190 checked (fall round), each with its last known location |
| Collection items with a storage location | none recorded | 212 catalog records, 209 items placed across 14 of 17 locations |
| Volunteer hours counted as grant match | sign-in sheets, not counted | 1,231.5 hours approved; $36,248 counted as match |
| Grant match met | tracked before reports only | $97,993 of $153,500 required, visible per award at any time |
| Field work billed to agencies | invoices built by hand | 184.5 hours and $16,339 invoiced straight from 44 logs |
| Youth reached through programs | rebuilt for each report | 154 of 589 attendees, counted as they came |
| Project time and money | no view | 1,111.5 staff hours; $131,418 spent of $195,940 planned |
| Work board | none | 13 openings, 7 hires |
| Month received | Share answered on time |
|---|---|
| Jan | 40% |
| Feb | 50% |
| Mar | 60% |
| Apr | 67% |
| May | 71% |
| Jun | 83% |
| Jul | 86% |
| Aug | 83% |
| Sep | 86% |
| Oct | 100% |
| Nov | 100% |
Redwood Bend demo network · consultations received January to November (December letters not yet due)
Time saved: about 390 staff hours, or ten working weeks
On the assumptions below, the office saved about 390 staff hours in the year, worth about $23,400 at an assumed $60 an hour, including benefits and overhead. Volumes come from the system. Consultation time is recorded; the other minutes per task are assumptions an office should replace with its own.
| Task | Volume | Before (min) | After (min) | Hours saved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant match and award reports | 12 reports | 480 | 120 | 72 |
| Answering consultation letters (recorded, see below) | 66 letters | 179 | 119 on average (76 by Sep–Nov) | 65 |
| Collection inventory rounds | 2 rounds | 3,600 | 1,800 | 60 |
| Checking what is due across the office | 240 workdays | 20 | 5 | 60 |
| Getting a new volunteer or staff member ready | 13 people | 300 | 120 | 39 |
| Volunteer hours: sign-in sheets typed up and totaled | 300 entries | 6 | 1 | 25 |
| Finding a matter's letters and calls | 76 entries | 20 | 5 | 19 |
| Council follow-up actions | 14 meetings | 75 | 15 | 14 |
| Program attendance counts for reports | 4 quarterly reports | 240 | 30 | 14 |
| Monitoring logs: mileage and costs entered once | 44 logs | 25 | 10 | 11 |
| Building monitoring invoices | 4 invoices | 180 | 20 | 11 |
| Total | 390 |
Not counted here: time lost to missed messages, and history lost when staff change.
Recorded, not estimated: time per letter
Staff logged their time against each consultation and matter all year, so the saving on letters is measured. Average time per answered letter fell from 2.98 hours in January and February to 1.26 hours in September to November.
| Month received | Hours per letter |
|---|---|
| Jan | 2.8 |
| Feb | 3.1 |
| Mar | 2.3 |
| Apr | 2.5 |
| May | 2.4 |
| Jun | 1.7 |
| Jul | 1.5 |
| Aug | 2.0 |
| Sep | 1.6 |
| Oct | 0.9 |
| Nov | 1.1 |
Redwood Bend demo network · Time and costs, 144 staff time entries on 66 answered consultations, January to November
Had all 66 answered letters taken the first months' 2.98 hours, they would have cost 197 hours; they took 131. Matters followed the same path: 3.13 hours each when opened in January and February, 1.21 hours in September to November.
Risks avoided and gaps closed
Nothing depended on one person's inbox or memory: 139 dated items from every part of the office sat on one Deadlines list, so work did not fall between staff. Each row below is something the system held up before it became a problem.
| Risk | What can happen | This year |
|---|---|---|
| A consultation deadline passes | The Nation loses its chance to comment on a project near a protected place | Every letter carried its due date onto the morning list; every letter answered from October was on time; 5 open letters past due and 3 due within 14 days are flagged |
| A staff member leaves or is out | Their letters, contacts and promises leave with them | All 78 consultations, 30 matters, 76 letters and calls and 39 contacts sit in one shared record |
| A loaned item is not returned | An object stays away with no one following up | 9 loans tracked; 2 overdue loans flagged by date |
| An item goes missing in storage | Loss noticed years later, if ever | Two inventory rounds; missing items fell from 8 of 62 in April to 4 of 190 in the fall, each with its last known location |
| Fragile items are not checked | Damage goes unnoticed | 14 conservation checks scheduled; 3 overdue and 2 due soon are flagged |
| An item held elsewhere is forgotten | The return conversation stalls | 8 items and copies being returned from outside institutions (1 completed, 1 declined); the 6 open ones each have a next follow-up date |
| Grant match falls short | Money returned to the funder, or a hard final report | Match met against required is visible per award at any time; one award at $13,400 of $57,000 is visible a year early |
| Volunteer time goes uncounted | In-kind value is lost to the Nation | $36,248 of volunteer time counted as match by month |
| A student volunteers without consent | A safety and liability gap | 7 students tracked; the one without guardian consent shows as not ready; 2 background checks pending are flagged |
| Wrong volunteer hours are submitted | Errors reach a funder report | 9 hour entries returned with a note before approval |
| Field work is not billed | The office absorbs agency costs | 184.5 hours and $16,339 invoiced from the logs; periods not yet invoiced stay visible |
| A council decision is not carried out | A resolution sits with no follow-up | 27 follow-up actions tracked; the 5 overdue are flagged |
| Training lapses | A monitor goes to the field without a current certification | Expired and expiring trainings flagged on Deadlines; changed procedures sent back to staff to read again |
| Restricted material is opened to the wrong person | A protocol is broken | Protocols show on the records they govern; 9 access requests decided and recorded; 29 protocol acknowledgments from 8 members |
Member engagement
Before the network opened in January there was no way to count any of this. In the first month, 44 members were active in an average week and the language pages had 143 visits; by November, about 145 members were active each week and the language pages had 3,106 visits a month.
Members active in an average week
Visits to language pages
Redwood Bend demo network · Network use (page visits per member per day), January to November
| Measure | This year |
|---|---|
| Word of the Day shown | 355 days, 148 different words |
| Words contributed by members | 265, of which 227 approved by the language program |
| Traditional knowledge entries | 48 (24 verified) |
| Cultural practices recorded | 25 completed (29 recorded), each with an elder witness |
| Stories told | 775: 23 oral histories (17.7 hours of recordings), 427 story posts, 325 answers to story prompts |
| Replies on posts | 613 |
| Language class attendance | 469 attendances across 30 sessions (26 classes, 4 immersion days) |
| Language class work | 2 assignments and 1 quiz; 6 hand-ins marked and 6 quiz tries scored |
| Questions to the office | 12 through the help desk; first reply in 6.5 hours (median); 5 of 6 rated answers helped |
| Members active in November | 164 of 276 |
The office approves every word before it reaches members, and oral histories carry their consent: signed, verbal, none or withdrawn.
Collection growth
The Collection grew from 26 recorded items to 238 in the year: most from the archive digitization project funded by the IMLS award, and 18 proposed by members and accepted by the office. 212 now have a catalog record, 209 a storage location, and 56 are open to visitors.
| Month | Items at month end | Added that month |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 35 | +9 |
| Feb | 44 | +9 |
| Mar | 58 | +14 |
| Apr | 76 | +18 |
| May | 96 | +20 |
| Jun | 120 | +24 |
| Jul | 138 | +18 |
| Aug | 159 | +21 |
| Sep | 173 | +14 |
| Oct | 198 | +25 |
| Nov | 218 | +20 |
| Dec | 238 | +20 |
Redwood Bend demo network · Collection items by the month recorded, January to December
Additions climbed from 9 in January to 14–25 a month from April, as the digitization work got going. 13 items are held under the Nation's protocols and 6 are kept private, so the system holds them without opening them.
TERO and local jobs
The Work board put 13 openings from 10 Tribal employers in front of members. Members applied 37 times, and 7 were hired. On the office's 3 TERO contracts, 13 of 21 hires (62%) went to Nation members or other Native workers, above the office's 60% target.
| Stage | This year |
|---|---|
| Openings posted | 13 from 10 Tribal employers; $16.00 to $34.00 an hour; 3 open to youth |
| Applications | 37, each moved through stages from new to hired, with interview dates and scores |
| Hired from the board | 7 (laborer, flagger, fisheries technician, front desk, archive technician, 2 youth camp counselors) |
| TERO contractors and contracts | 3 contractors with certification dates; 3 contracts |
| Hiring on TERO contracts | 21 hires; 13 preference hires (62%) against a 60% target |
| Worker registry | 30 members with a worker profile; 25 looking for work; 19 list certifications |
Only applicants are named, and only to the office staff who run the Work board. The numbers-only report carries no names.
Grant applications
The office won 6 of the 11 applications funders decided, 55%, bringing in $686,000 of the $1,036,000 decided. Every application passed the Nation's own approvals before it went out: 65 recorded decisions by Administration and Council.
| Stage | Applications | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Awarded | 6 | $686,000 |
| Declined by the funder | 5 | $350,000 |
| Submitted, waiting for the funder | 3 | $460,000 |
| Being drafted | 4 | $335,000 |
| Being considered (1 not approved to proceed) | 5 | $418,000 |
| Withdrawn by the office | 1 | $120,000 |
Each award is linked to its application, so the reporting dates, match and spending in Grants and reporting trace back to what was promised.
Training and standards
27 staff and volunteers completed 135 trainings in the year, 127 confirmed by the office, and support tickets fell from 18 in the first two months to none in December as people learned the system from its own manual.
| Measure | This year |
|---|---|
| Trainings, certifications and procedures kept | 13, four of them procedures now at version 2 or 3 |
| Completions | 135 (127 confirmed, 8 waiting for the office) |
| Certifications caught before they lapsed | 10 expiring within 60 days flagged on Deadlines; 3 expired and flagged |
| Procedures read again after a change | 27 re-reads; 11 people still asked to read the newest version of 12 procedures |
| Who can cover which work | 40 skills across 13 kinds of work; 3 known by only one person (accession numbering, boat operation, council minutes) |
| Training manual | Every part read by someone; 28 people have read at least one part |
| Questions answered from the manual | 300 asked, 86% answered; 250 more found the answer in the manual's how-tos |
| Quarter | Support tickets | Manual did not answer |
|---|---|---|
| Jan–Feb | 18 | 36 |
| Mar–May | 13 | 25 |
| Jun–Aug | 8 | 18 |
| Sep–Nov | 1 | 8 |
| Dec | 0 | 3 |
The parts people still asked about after reading them (Consultations, Today and this week, Admissions, Programs and Grant applications) are where the manual and training get improved next.
Knowledge Keepers
Ten elders and knowledge holders were recognized for their knowledge, with 44 honoraria totaling $8,500 paid in the year. Each keeper's record says what they hold, whether and how they may be asked, and every payment, so the office can show funders and council how elders are compensated.
Occasions this year: language class visits, oral history sessions, advice on consultations, teaching at the youth camp and briefings to the council. Keepers' records are sensitive: only people given the Knowledge Keepers role can open them.
Nothing leaves without the Nation's say
Every request to use or open the Nation's material was decided by the office and recorded, including 3 research requests declined and 2 protocol access requests declined.
| Request | This year | Decisions |
|---|---|---|
| Outside researchers asking to use material | 13 requests | 3 approved, 3 approved with conditions, 3 declined, 4 still being reviewed; 8 items shared, each one logged |
| Members proposing items and places | 46 proposals | 29 accepted (18 Collection items, 11 protected Atlas places), 7 declined with a note, 10 waiting |
| Members asking to open material held under a protocol | 9 requests | 3 granted, 2 declined, 1 withdrawn, 3 waiting for the protocol's keeper |
| Items held under the Nation's protocols | 13 Collection items | Shown only to those the protocol allows |
| Members acknowledging the protocols | 29 members | Recorded with the date |
| Items kept private by the people who gave them | 6 | Not shown, even to office staff |
Who may see what is set by role: 17 roles held by 19 people, each role limited to its own part of the office, with 31 changes to access logged. Researchers who take conditions owe results back by a due date, which sits on the office's Deadlines list.
What it would take otherwise
Most small Tribal offices cannot afford separate tools for this work, so it is done by hand, and that is where the risks in this study come from. The table shows, for each area, what a typical separate tool costs a small office in a year and what doing it by hand looks like. Prices are published subscription prices, current at the time of writing, for an office this size. ECO takes no payments and holds no card details, by design.
| Area | ECO | Separate tool, a year | Done by hand |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member community | Complete, private | $1,068 ($950–$10,740) | Public social media under the platform's terms |
| Collections and registrar | Complete | $1,245 ($540–$3,420) | Spreadsheet; items lost track of |
| Visitor passes and gallery screens | Complete | $1,632 ($432–$9,072) | Paper passes and sign-in sheets |
| Oral history archive with consent | Complete | $1,680 ($100–$3,680) | Recordings on drives; consent on paper |
| Consultations, letters and contacts | Complete | $1,440 ($0–$3,240) | Inboxes and a wall calendar |
| Grants, awards and match | Complete | $4,188 ($995–$11,988) | Match rebuilt before each report |
| Volunteers and in-kind hours | Complete | $1,428 ($300–$1,716) | Sign-in sheets; hours never counted |
| Projects with plans and budgets | Complete | $1,368 ($648–$1,440) | No view of planned against actual |
| Staff training records | Complete | $1,142 ($0–$8,286) | Knowledge leaves with the person |
| Council records | Complete | $3,599 ($2,519–$9,000) | Follow-ups by memory |
| Time and mileage | Complete | $1,920 ($959–$1,920) | Paper logs; field work not billed |
| Device inventory | Complete | $400 ($0–$1,000) | Spreadsheet, if anything |
| Language classes | Complete | $948 ($0–$1,968) | Paper rosters |
| Site mapping | Complete | $3,225 ($0–$7,188) | Paper logs and separate maps |
| Job board and TERO | Complete | $1,000 ($0–$3,588) | Flyers and word of mouth |
| Help desk | Complete | $684 ($0–$1,980) | Phone and email |
| These 16 together | $26,967 ($7,443–$80,226) | ||
| Selling tickets and taking payments | Not in scope | ECO creates and tracks the tickets and lets visitors in; the office sells or gives them out and charges itself |
Across all these areas ECO also gives email reminders, e-signatures, spreadsheet import and export, and a public page that shows only what the Nation chooses. Mapping software is often free to federally recognized Tribes, so that line may cost nothing in practice. Two areas have no ready-made tool at any price, consultation tracking and a TERO registry, so Tribes usually pay to have them built. On ownership, most tools leave ownership with the customer, but many take a lasting right to use what is entered, and some pass it on or use it in their marketing. ECO's right to use the Nation's content covers only running the Nation's network, and ECO never uses it for anything commercial.
The full cost: separate tools or ECO
Subscriptions are only part of what separate tools cost. The table adds what an office also pays to set them up, move its records in, train staff, keep about 15 tools running, connect them, and build the two tools no one sells.
| Separate-tool route (typical) | First year | Each year after |
|---|---|---|
| Subscriptions for the 16 areas | $26,967 | $26,967 |
| Setup and onboarding | $8,000 | — |
| Moving records in | $8,000 | — |
| Staff training | $5,000 | $1,500 |
| Outside IT and admin for about 15 tools | $30,000 | $22,500 |
| Building and keeping a consultation tracker and TERO registry | $46,000 | $8,000 |
| Connecting the tools | $3,800 | $1,800 |
| E-signatures and email reminders | $1,320 | $1,320 |
| Total | $129,087 | $62,087 |
| Range | $39,471–$350,646 | $17,471–$175,646 |
ECO's cost is heaviest in the first year, while ECO sets the office up, loads its records, trains staff and gets it running. After that the office runs the system itself, and support drops to as needed.
| ECO | First year | Each year after |
|---|---|---|
| Org Admin, $500 a month | $6,000 | $6,000 |
| Museum module, $1,000 a month | $12,000 | $12,000 |
| Education module, $500 a month | $6,000 | $6,000 |
| 100 users at an average of $12.50 a month | $15,000 | $15,000 |
| Setup, loading and training: 8–10 hours a week at $175 an hour | $72,800–$91,000 | As needed |
| Total | $111,800–$130,000 | $39,000, plus support as needed |
The first year costs about the same either way. From the second year, ECO costs about $23,000 a year less than the typical separate-tool route, before any as-needed support. Over three years that is about $45,000 to $63,000 less, and the office has one system its staff know instead of 15. An office can also start with 4–5 hours of support a week, which makes the first year $75,400–$84,500. 100 users is the starting point; as the community joins, the office adds members at $9.99 a month (Conductor) or $14.99 a month (ConductorPro, with more capacity), averaging $12.50. None of this counts the $76,000 a year in value shown below, or the staff time it takes to run separate tools.
What a funder asks for
The figures a Tribal office reports to its funders came out of the year's daily work, without a separate count before each report. The measures below are the kinds each funder commonly asks for; each award's own terms say exactly what to report.
| Funder | Asks about | This year | Source in ECO |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANA (language preservation) | Learners, progress, instruction, words documented | 38 learners (43 course enrollments) with 86 progress checks, most moving up a level; 469 class attendances; 25 lessons; 265 words contributed, 227 approved; Word of the Day on 355 days | Teach, Program, language library |
| ANA (social and economic development) | People served, jobs, partnerships | 589 program attendees; 7 hires from 13 openings; 12 partner organizations | Programs, Work board, People and organizations |
| IMLS (Native American library and museum services) | Items cataloged, preserved, made accessible; people served | 212 items added (238 in all), 212 cataloged, 209 in a known location; 2 inventory rounds; 14 conservation checks; 56 items open to visitors; 221 visitor passes; 5 exhibits | Collection, Registrar, Admissions |
| NEH (documenting culture) | Recordings, knowledge documented, public programs | 23 oral history recordings, 1,064 minutes (17.7 hours) from 23 narrators, consent recorded on each; 48 knowledge entries; 25 practices completed with an elder witness; 775 stories told | Oral histories, culture library, Network use |
| NPS (Tribal historic preservation) | Consultations reviewed, sites monitored, staff time | 78 consultations received, 17 of 18 answered letters on time in Sep–Nov, 5 open letters past due and flagged; 24 site visits; 44 monitoring logs; 8 Atlas places inventoried | Consultations, Atlas, Monitoring |
| U.S. Forest Service (cost-share) | Hours, miles and costs on the agreement | 184.5 hours and $16,339 invoiced from monitoring logs | Monitoring, Time and costs |
| NTIA (digital equity and connectivity) | People connected and using services | 164 of 276 members active in November; about 145 active in an average week; 40 office devices tracked | Network use, Device inventory |
| Any award with match | Match required against match met | $97,993 of $153,500 met, including $36,248 of volunteer time | Grants and reporting, Volunteer program |
| Foundations (youth and elders) | Youth and elders reached | 154 youth and 193 elders among 589 attendees; 7 student volunteers | Programs, Volunteer program |
What the records show
In place of quotes, these statements are read straight from the office's own records; each can be checked against the page named beside it.
- On time: 66 consultation letters answered. The on-time share of answered letters rose from 45% in January and February to 94% in September to November; 5 open letters are past due and flagged. (Consultations)
- Nothing lost between staff: 76 letters, calls and meetings and 36 outside contacts are kept in one shared record, not in personal inboxes. (Matters, People and organizations)
- Risks raised early: 139 dated items from every part of the office were tracked on one list, including overdue loans, conservation checks, council actions and expiring trainings. (Deadlines)
- Collection accounted for: missing items at inventory fell from 8 of 62 in April to 4 of 190 in the fall, and the Collection grew from 26 to 238 items, 212 of them with a catalog record. (Collection, Registrar)
- Community time counted: 1,231.5 volunteer hours approved, $36,248 counted as grant match, and 8 entries corrected before they reached a funder. (Volunteer program)
- Funding in view: $686,000 across 6 awards, with $97,993 of $153,500 in required match already met. (Grants and reporting)
- Field work paid for: $16,339 invoiced to agencies from 44 monitoring logs. (Monitoring)
- Reach: 589 people attended 42 programs; 154 of them were youth. (Programs and attendance)
- Safe volunteering: all 7 student volunteers tracked for guardian consent; the one without it shows as not ready. (Volunteer program)
Also from the records: about 145 members active in an average week by November, up from 44; 265 words contributed by members; 775 stories told.
What the year was worth to the office
The year's records gave the office about $76,000 in value it could put to use: volunteer time counted toward its share on grants, field work billed to agencies straight from the monitoring logs, and staff time saved. This value is separate from the cost comparison above and is not counted in it.
| Value | Amount |
|---|---|
| Volunteer time counted as grant match | $36,248 |
| Field work billed to agencies from monitoring logs | $16,339 |
| Staff time saved, 390 hours at an assumed $60 an hour | $23,400 |
| Total | $75,987 |
Read it in two parts. Money the office could claim: $52,587 of match and billing it had the records to show. Capacity: 390 staff hours, about ten working weeks, back for the Nation's own work. The cost of the separate-tool route is in the section above and is not added here.
Also included
- The Nation's data stays the Nation's. Everything entered belongs to the Nation. ECO owns only the software and claims no ownership of what the office or its members put in. Nothing is sold, served to advertisers or used to train any system. Whenever the Nation asks, ECO prepares a full export of its records in files that open without ECO. See the data sovereignty page.
- What members get. Historical figures, a Word of the Day, mentoring, virtual events and messages from leaders at milestones. Each member decides who sees their own content, and one sign-in covers the Nation's network and a private family network, kept separate under the Nation's protocols. These are why members keep coming back and the network grows.
- A podcast and a free library. The office can share its own episodes with members, with no ads and no outside host holding the audio, and everyone can read the library's e-books at no cost.
- Museum screens and devices. 3 gallery screens show items opened to visitors, and 40 office devices are tracked for connectivity grants.
Method, assumptions and limits
- Source: the Redwood Bend demo network, one calendar year of records, January to December. Active members are counted from page use per member per day. Language pages are Teach, Program, Teachings, Tribe words and Language. Word of the Day figures are replayed from the feature's daily rule, which keeps no log. All records were created for demonstration and are labeled DEMO or SAMPLE.
- Baseline: the "before" picture is assumed, based on conversations with tribal offices across the nation. January and February stand in for the office's first months.
- Time saved: volumes are from the records. Minutes per task and the $60 hourly cost (pay plus benefits and overhead) are assumptions; an office can use its own.
- Recorded and estimated: time per consultation letter and per matter is recorded in Time and costs (220 entries); time on other tasks is estimated.
- Inventory: each round is compared with the items in the Collection when it started, at their locations that day.
- Costs: separate-tool prices are published prices and rates, current at the time of writing, for an office this size. Outside IT hours and custom-build costs are estimates, because little is published for offices like this one. ECO's costs are its standard Tribal office rates; each office's proposal sets its own.
- No quotes: no statements are attributed to people; the statements above are read from records.
About the museum module
The museum module built into ECO was reviewed against several dedicated museum collections systems, and for an office of this size it is capable and comparable to them: catalog records, object entry with receipts and deeds of gift, an accession register, storage locations with QR labels, phone-scan inventory, loans, valuations, rights requests and a full change history.
It follows the same industry standards those systems use, including Spectrum collections procedures, Nomenclature 4.0 object names and Dublin Core export, and builds on them with what a Tribal office also needs: protocols set by the Nation, consented oral histories, language names with pronunciation, and community participation in naming and describing items.
About the Office assistant
A small Tribal office of one to three staff covers the phones, email, grants, council and community requests. The Office assistant, part of My Office, takes the routine drafting and tracking off their desks, so staff get hours back each week for language and culture work. It is new since the year described above and is not counted in any figure in this case study.
What it handles for a small office
- Inbox replies. Staff paste an email or a member's question, and the Office assistant drafts a reply from the office's own approved answers, hours, contacts and programs. Anything it cannot answer is marked "needs a person", never guessed.
- Meeting minutes. Rough notes become a draft agenda and minutes in the office's own template, with action items turned into tasks with owners and dates.
- Grant deadlines. One calendar of grant deadlines, with reminders to the assigned staff member 30, 14, 7 and 1 days ahead.
- Grant report drafts. A narrative and numbers filled in from the projects, volunteer hours and in-kind value already recorded in ECO, for the grant and period chosen.
- Consultation letters. Acknowledgement and follow-up letters drafted from the consultation tracker, with the agency, project and deadline already in place.
- Scheduling. Suggested volunteer and event schedules from the volunteer roster and the events calendar.
- Monthly council report. The month's projects, grants, consultations, events, volunteer hours and member requests brought together in one report.
How it is kept safe
- Draft only. A staff member approves, edits or discards every draft. Nothing is sent, posted or filed on its own, and it never decides enrollment, money, council matters or eligibility.
- Respects the Nation's protocols. It works only with records the signed-in staff member may already see, and never reads or quotes restricted, sacred or protocol-limited material.
- Data stays the Nation's. Drafts are kept in the Nation's own network, nothing is used to train any system, and every action is logged (who, what and when) for the Org Admin to review.
- Off by default. The Org Admin turns it on for the network and chooses which jobs are on.
See the Office assistant page.
What the office assistants are worth to an office
Hours back each week for language and culture work.
Six assistants in My Office take the routine drafting and tracking off staff desks. Like the Office assistant above, they are not counted in any figure in the Redwood Bend year.
Office assistant
- Drafts replies to emails and members' questions from the office's approved answers
- Turns rough notes into meeting agendas and minutes, with action items as tasks
- Keeps grant deadlines in one calendar and sends reminders
- Drafts grant reports from what is already recorded
- Drafts consultation acknowledgement and follow-up letters
- Suggests volunteer and event schedules
- Brings the month together in one council report
Grants assistant
- Matches new funding notices to the priorities the Nation has set
- Drafts an eligibility checklist for each notice worth pursuing
- Lays out a timeline that leaves room for a council resolution and agency review
- Drafts a budget outline to start from
- Sends reminders as each step comes due
Consultation intake assistant
- Gives agencies one submission link for consultation requests
- Logs each request with its project, agency, deadline and map location
- Flags overlap with the Nation's monitored places without revealing restricted details
- Drafts acknowledgements and follow-ups for staff to send
Council packet assistant
- Drafts each meeting's agenda and packet from the council records
- Lists minutes waiting for approval, open action items and resolutions waiting for action
- Suggests new business, such as grant applications that need the council's approval
- Drafts resolutions in the usual form, leaving numbers, citations and votes to people
- Keeps the follow-up list from the minutes, with a reminder note for each owner
Site monitoring assistant
- Turns field visitors' entries into a visit report for each monitored place
- Lists visits that are overdue, never made or coming due, and places with no one assigned
- Drafts the periodic report an agency partner expects, with no coordinates, visitor names or findings text
- Leaves out places held under a Tribe-defined Protocol
Workforce assistant
- Drafts job postings from Work board openings, with the Nation's preference wording to confirm
- Lists applicants by preference status and matching skills; people decide who is hired
- Shows registry fit as counts, never names
- Drafts TERO summaries: contracts, preference hires against the target, hours, fees and certifications to renew
The same rules for all six
- Draft only. Staff approve, edit or discard every draft; nothing goes out on its own.
- The Nation's protocols first. They work only with what the signed-in staff member may already see.
- The data stays the Nation's. Drafts stay in the Nation's own network and are never used to train any system.
- Off by default. The Org Admin turns each one on.
- Every action logged. Who asked, what was drafted and who approved it, with the date.
The financial benefit: an illustrative model
Illustrative model, not measured results. The figures below are estimates from the assumptions stated with them. They are not drawn from the Redwood Bend records or from any office's results. An office should replace each assumption with its own.
| Office size | Routine hours the assistants can take on, per staff member a week | Estimated hours back a year | Estimated value a year, at $60 an hour | Share of a 40-hour week freed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small (1–3 staff) | 3–5 | 138–690 | $8,280–$41,400 | 7.5–12.5% |
| Medium (4–10 staff) | 2–4 | 368–1,840 | $22,080–$110,400 | 5–10% |
| Large (11+ staff; modeled at 11–20) | 1.5–3 | 759–2,760 | $45,540–$165,600 | 3.75–7.5% |
Total dollar value grows with office size because volume grows, but the share of capacity freed is largest for the smallest offices. In a one-to-three-person office the same few people cover every letter, deadline and report, so the routine work the assistants take on is a bigger part of each person's week.
The ranges stay at the conservative hours above. An office that also runs council records, monitored places or a TERO program has more of this routine work each month (packets, resolutions, partner reports, postings and TERO summaries), so its hours back sit toward the top of its range.
Assumptions
| Assumption | Small (1–3) | Medium (4–10) | Large (11+) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Routine drafting and tracking hours per staff member a week the assistants can take on (conservative) | 3–5 | 2–4 | 1.5–3 |
| Loaded staff cost, including benefits | $60 an hour | $60 an hour | $60 an hour |
| Consultation requests a year | 20–60 | 60–150 | 150–400 |
| Grant cycles a year | 3–6 | 6–12 | 12–25 |
| Working weeks a year | 46 | 46 | 46 |
Benefits beyond salary
- Fewer missed consultation deadlines. Every request is logged with its deadline on the day it arrives, and acknowledgements are ready to send.
- Fewer missed grant deadlines. Reminders reach the assigned staff member 30, 14, 7 and 1 days ahead, with time built in for council resolutions and agency review.
- Possibly more applications submitted. When notices are matched and checklists drafted, an office may be able to pursue funding it would otherwise let pass.
- Faster reporting. Grant reports and the monthly council report start from what is already recorded, not from a blank page.
- Steadier records through staff turnover. Drafts, logs and deadlines stay in the office's shared record when someone leaves.
How we estimated this
Hours back a year = number of staff × routine hours each staff member's week the assistants can take on × 46 working weeks. The low end of each range uses the fewest staff in the size band and the low hours; the high end uses the most staff (20 for a large office) and the high hours. Dollar value = hours back × loaded staff cost of $60 an hour. Share of a week freed = hours a staff member a week ÷ 40. The hours per staff member are set lower for larger offices because routine drafting and tracking are spread across more people and some roles carry little of it. The consultation and grant volumes show the kind of workload behind those hours; they are not multiplied in separately. Results vary with how an office works, which assistants it turns on and how much staff time goes to review; the model counts time back, not the time staff spend approving drafts, so the low end of each range is the safer figure to plan on.
EternalCurrent.Online · Sample case study from demo data, for illustration · Admin@eternalcurrent.online